Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Doubt related to rrc tables


From: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:14:08 +0100

2014-02-26 8:59 GMT+01:00 Rahul Rohit <rahul.rohit () aricent com>:

 Hi,



Why don't we have rrc.proc.imsg  tables like ranap.proc.imsg or
nbap.proc.imsg tables ??

on what criteria this tables are defined ??


Hi,

simply because RRC protocol has nothing to do with RANAP or NBAP protocols
and does not describe the messages the same way. With RRC protocol, you
need to know on which logical channel the message is transmitted and then
the bit sequence allows you to identify the message.
NBAP/RANAP requires the use of tables to identify the message based on the
message family (Initiating, SuccessfulOutcome, UnsuccessfulOutcome,
Outcome) and a procedure code.

Pascal.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: