Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Current 'pre-commit' issues


From: Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 08:22:22 +0200

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Jeff Morriss
<jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com> wrote:
On 07/11/14 12:42, Bill Meier wrote:

I've been working with the current 'pre-commit' and have noticed the
following issues:

[...]

1. For the above reasons, I propose that pre-commit only do checkAPIs,
    checkhf and fix-encoding-args for dissector files (to be determined
    in a rather ugly ad-hoc way by seeing if the file is named
    "packet-.+\.[hc]" (as is done now with 'checkAPIs -p').

    pre-commit would still do the whitespace check for all files.

    checkAPIs can be called for all .[hc] files when/if the current
    Errors are fixed.


Right now the intelligence about which files are checked with what
(checkAPIs) parameters is in Makefile.nmake.  Last I checked those
parameters were not accurately reflected in Makefile.am.  And then we've
also got CMakeLists.txt and now also the pre-commit script.

Sounds like a strong argument to move that intelligence into checkAPIs
itself (or a config file to it) rather than trying to maintain it in 4
locations...
+1



___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: