Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Cmake qt build
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 23:54:36 -0700
On Aug 27, 2014, at 3:10 PM, Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org> wrote:
On 8/27/14 2:28 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote:On 08/27/14 16:57, Evan Huus wrote:On master, cmake seems to still be building "wireshark" for gtk and "qtshark" for qt. Should that be "wireshark" for qt and "wireshark-gtk" or "wireshark-legacy" for gtk?+1. Unfortunately each time I make a change in that direction it seems like someone complains. :)
For Wireshark 2 (or whatever the next release is called), I'd strongly vote for calling the regular version - i.e., the Qt version - just "wireshark", calling the GTK+ version "wireshark-gtk", and letting the complainers rename the binary themselves if they don't like the name. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Cmake qt build Evan Huus (Aug 27)
- Re: Cmake qt build Jeff Morriss (Aug 27)
- Re: Cmake qt build Evan Huus (Aug 27)
- Re: Cmake qt build Gerald Combs (Aug 27)
- Re: Cmake qt build Alexis La Goutte (Aug 27)
- Re: Cmake qt build Guy Harris (Aug 27)
- Re: Cmake qt build Anders Broman (Aug 28)
- Re: Cmake qt build Gerald Combs (Aug 29)
- Re: Cmake qt build Jeff Morriss (Aug 27)