Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-commits] master 31f3187: Fix warning: no previous prototype for ... [-Wmissing-prototypes]
From: Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 18:35:24 -0400
On 8/18/2014 5:11 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
On 08/18/14 09:14, Wireshark code review wrote:Fix warning: no previous prototype for ... [-Wmissing-prototypes][...]Actions performed: from 3adbd93 Fix warning: no previous prototype for ... [-Wmissing-prototypes] adds 31f3187 Fix warning: no previous prototype for ... [-Wmissing-prototypes] Summary of changes: ui/cli/tap-iousers.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)Would it be reasonable to request fewer commits with the same comment but to different files? E.g., rather than 9 commits covering 10 files (as we had here) could there be 1 commit? Having so many commits makes reading the -commits list more tiring than [I think] it should be.
+1 ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master 31f3187: Fix warning: no previous prototype for ... [-Wmissing-prototypes] Jeff Morriss (Aug 18)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] master 31f3187: Fix warning: no previous prototype for ... [-Wmissing-prototypes] Bill Meier (Aug 18)