Re: overriding dissector for port 8080

[Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan () oracle com>]

On Apr 4, 2014, at 9:56 AM, John Dill <John.Dill () greenfieldeng com> wrote:

> > > I also noticed a disabled_protos.[ch], so maybe there is a feature to
> > > disable other protocols.  Is there a feature that could be used to hide
> > > protocols I don't need in the Filter Expression (to reduce the list to
> > > simplify the interface to users)?
> >
> > No, I don't think there's a way to simplify what's in the Filter 
> > Expression dialog short of removing dissectors from Wireshark (probably 
> > more effort than it's worth).
>
> The only reason would be to simplify the interface for test engineers who
> like to streamline their process (it would remove the need to constantly
> type the protocol abbreviation).  It would happen at the end of the
> development cycle if at all.

Can’t you just create some filter macros [1] to do that for you?

[1] http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked/ChDisplayFilterMacrosSection.html

-hadriel

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe