Re: Transport name resolution

[Dirk Jagdmann <doj () cubic org>]

> Should we, instead, look the port number up in the "tcp.port" or "udp.port" (or "sctp.port") dissector table and, if it 
> finds a dissector handle, look up the short name of the protocol for that dissector handle and use that?

I think this is more useful, since the dissector short name is typically used as 
the filter prefix. It is just confusing if slightly different strings are shown, 
because they come from some other list/database.

--
---> Dirk Jagdmann
----> http://cubic.org/~doj
-----> http://llg.cubic.org
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe