Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Handling of generated dissectors


From: Bálint Réczey <balint () balintreczey hu>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:03:58 +0200

2013/10/7 Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>:
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 04:27:50PM -0400, Evan Huus wrote:
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> wrote:
Hello,

Matthieu raised an issue that I've seen with asn2wrs generated dissectors
too, just not to the extent of the pidl dissectors. To make it much harder
to miss that the changes we are doing are to generated dissectors I see
two approaches:
- Name the files differently, e.g. prefix with gpacket- instead of packet-,
  so we know when we check that file in that there should be an accompanying
  basefile or generator patch.
- Have a checkin script check for the term generated in the first few lines
  and annotate the commit message that a generated file was changed.

Thoughts?

Ideally we wouldn't keep generated files in svn/git at all. We would
keep the sources and (if necessary) the generating tool, and we would
make generating them part of the build process. This slows down the
initial build somewhat, but it makes it absolutely impossible for them
to get out of sync.

True. OK, looks like another solution which looks more convincing than
the ones I proposed.
I support Evan's approach, too. With automake generated Makefiles it was
not a real option since the cross-directory make target dependencies were
not complete, and with the recursive nature of the generated Makefile structure
it was not really manageable easily. I think after switching to CMake and
removing automake build system we could remove all generated files, too.

Cheers,
Balint
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: