Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 53118: /trunk/epan/ /trunk/epan/: reassemble.c

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Nov 6, 2013, at 1:59 PM, mmann () wireshark org wrote:

> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=53118
>
> User: mmann
> Date: 2013/11/06 09:59 PM
>
> Log:
> Correctly report segments marked with REASSEMBLE_FLAGS_NO_FRAG_NUMBER.  Bug 9304 
> (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9304)
>
> Instead of incrementing the offset for each new segment by one we add the length of the segment so that each segment 
> is correctly shown in the segment list.
>
> It proves to be very useful to find which packet (segment) is causing an application dissector to go wrong.
>
> From Matthieu Patou

This may have broken some tests:

        http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-XP-x86/builds/7185/steps/test.sh/logs/stdio

5  Suite: Unit tests
5.1 Step: exntest OK
5.2 Step: oids_test OK
5.3 Step: reassemble_test
Starting test test_simple_fragment_add_seq
Assertion failed at line 256: NULL!=fd_head (0!=0)

"reassemble_test" Failed!
exit status of C:\buildbot/wireshark/trunk-32/winxpx86/build/wireshark-gtk2/reassemble_test: 1
./testout.txt:Starting test test_simple_fragment_add_seq
./testout.txt:Assertion failed at line 256: NULL!=fd_head (0!=0)

Either the tests are wrong or the change introduced a bug.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe