Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Future of glib?
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 23:32:37 +0100
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 09:54:45PM +0100, Roland Knall wrote:
Just a short question. If the long-term goal is to switch to Qt, what ist the long-term plan for glib? As of now, many dissectors use the data types, tables, etc.
Qt (both, version 4 and 5) *depend* on glib. You cannot successfully link a Qt program without glib on your system. ciao Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Future of glib? Roland Knall (Nov 03)
- Re: Future of glib? Gerald Combs (Nov 03)
- Re: Future of glib? Roland Knall (Nov 03)
- Re: Future of glib? Gerald Combs (Nov 03)
- Re: Future of glib? Roland Knall (Nov 03)
- Re: Future of glib? Joerg Mayer (Nov 03)
- Re: Future of glib? Gerald Combs (Nov 03)