Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Modifying custom giop dissector
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 14:02:06 -0800
On Nov 27, 2013, at 9:34 AM, mmann78 () netscape net wrote:
I don't think a solution currently exists with the parser. I think you need to modify the omniorb parser (patches welcome!), either by adding support for "additional" fields in the IDL or somehow providing a "custom" data hook (as I don't think one is currently provided), perhaps in a file separate from the IDL.
At least some other tools that take a protocol/interface description language and turn it into a dissector have separate "conformance" (.cnf) files to handle that; see, for example, asn2wrs and Samba's pidl. That would be my inclination, as it means that you wouldn't have to hack the IDL files (and have to maintain modified IDL files). ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Modifying custom giop dissector andy . ling (Nov 27)
- Re: Modifying custom giop dissector mmann78 (Nov 27)
- Re: Modifying custom giop dissector andy . ling (Nov 27)
- Re: Modifying custom giop dissector andy . ling (Nov 27)
- Re: Modifying custom giop dissector mmann78 (Nov 27)
- Re: Modifying custom giop dissector andy . ling (Nov 27)
- Re: Modifying custom giop dissector andy . ling (Nov 27)
- Re: Modifying custom giop dissector mmann78 (Nov 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Modifying custom giop dissector mmann78 (Nov 27)
- Re: Modifying custom giop dissector andy . ling (Nov 27)
- Re: Modifying custom giop dissector Guy Harris (Nov 28)