Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: tshark problem with grouped AVP:s?
From: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 22:25:00 +0100
Hello Anders, On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 04:14:02PM +0000, Anders Broman wrote:
The following tshark parameters " -Y diameter -z proto,colinfo,diameter.Experimental-Result-Code,diameter.Experimental-Result-Code" yields no result where as -Y diameter -z proto,colinfo,diameter.Result-Code,diameter.Result-Code Does the only difference seems to be that the first one is grouped. Looking at the code I can't see why it shouldn't work - ideas?
Any capture file to work on this? ;-) ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- tshark problem with grouped AVP:s? Anders Broman (Nov 14)
- Re: tshark problem with grouped AVP:s? Jakub Zawadzki (Nov 14)
- Re: tshark problem with grouped AVP:s? Jeff Morriss (Nov 14)
- Re: tshark problem with grouped AVP:s? Jeff Morriss (Nov 14)
- Re: tshark problem with grouped AVP:s? Anders Broman (Nov 14)
- Re: tshark problem with grouped AVP:s? Jeff Morriss (Nov 14)
- Re: tshark problem with grouped AVP:s? Anders Broman (Nov 14)
- Re: tshark problem with grouped AVP:s? Jakub Zawadzki (Nov 14)