Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: where is WTAP_ENCAP type 80 (K12) in Import menue/or why is it not there?


From: Anders Broman <a.broman () bredband net>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 22:48:01 +0100

Ariel Burbaickij skrev 2013-03-04 22:02:
>What's the underlying link-layer type for the packets in your rf5 file?
good bad ol' E.1/MTP2 (I am almost tempter to add "of course" here)
>Let the user read a text file containing raw packet data in hex-dump form without requiring them to go to the command line and run >text2pcap. Uhm, maybe I am slow wit here but we have SS7 MTP2, MTP3, SCCP there so as NOT text-based protocols as one can imagine or do I miss something? Then again, if SS7 MTP2 is supported can we just "strip" somehow K-12's overhead here and run text2pcap on whatever reamins there?
/wbr
Ariel Burbaickij

You should be able to use "file open" on a .rf5 file no need to do file import which is used differently as explained earlier.
Regards
Anders

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu <mailto:guy () alum mit edu>> wrote:


    On Mar 4, 2013, at 10:46 AM, Ariel Burbaickij
    <ariel.burbaickij () gmail com <mailto:ariel.burbaickij () gmail com>>
    wrote:

    > Thank you for fast response, Guy.
    >
    >> not all link-layer header types that Wireshark can handle have
    corresponding pcap/pcap-ng link-layer header types - in
    particular, neither Tektronix rf5 nor HP nettl X.25 do
    >
    > So, is it something like work in progress and pcap/pcap-ng
    headers are going to be added or is it frozen for now?

    Neither.

    The list of link-layer header types is not frozen, but there is
    not, and probably never will be, an official tcpdump.org
    <http://tcpdump.org> project or Wireshark to add particular
    link-layer header types; new types are added when somebody sends a
    request for a type to tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org
    <mailto:tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org> and the request is
    accepted.

    The current list, and instructions on how to add values, are at

    http://www.tcpdump.org/linktypes.html

    >> So why isn't that good enough?
    >
    > Because we would like to replay (using tcpreplay) files in pcap
    format, among other things.

    Adding a new link-layer header type won't be sufficient; you'll
    also have to write a DLT plugin for the new type:

    http://tcpreplay.synfin.net/wiki/tcpeditDeveloper

    What's the underlying link-layer type for the packets in your rf5
    file?

    What might be called for here is an *export* option to strip off
    metadata that's neither needed nor wanted by particular programs,
    converting encapsulations with no corresponding pcap/pcap-ng
    link-layer header type to one of those link-layer header types.

    >> "Open packet hex dump text file",
    >
    > Let us try to work backwards here -- what is it actually
    supposed to do?

    Let the user read a text file containing raw packet data in
    hex-dump form without requiring them to go to the command line and
    run text2pcap.
    ___________________________________________________________________________
    Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list
    <wireshark-users () wireshark org <mailto:wireshark-users () wireshark org>>
    Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
    Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
                 mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org
    <mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org>?subject=unsubscribe




___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
              mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: