Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Renaming some value-string API functions


From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 12:29:53 +0100

On 03/22/2013 09:35 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
As proposed and discussed in bug #8467. Any objections?

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8467

Took some digging to find the rationale here:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8461#c12

Besides what's written there, don't forget about the *_ext interfaces here.
Oh, and _all_ documentation / code samples, etc.

I get the idea, but we're wondering into parser territory here. It might be a
whole can-o-worms.

Just my E0.02,
Jaap




___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: