Warning on useless extended value strings?

[Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>]

Would anyone object to a g_warning if an extended value string has to
fall back to linear search? It probably indicates either a typo in the
value-string or somebody not understanding how extended value strings
work.

Didn't want to put this in without asking because if there is a reason
I'm not aware of it would cause a ton of fuzz failures.

Evan

P.S. I thought of this while digging around thinking about
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8467 - I'm still
technically waiting for the original reporter to ACK it, but if anyone
else has feedback it would be appreciated.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe