Re: qtshark -> wireshark-qt ?

[Bálint Réczey <balint () balintreczey hu>]

2013/3/13 Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>:
> I believe when building with autotools and passing --with-qt to
> configure that the resulting binary is still just called 'wireshark'?
> I don't know what happens when you try and build both together, but I
> don't have a problem with that producing wireshark-gtk2,
> wireshark-gtk3 or wireshark-qt as appropriate.
I the first round (at least for 1.10.x) I think we could keep the name
of the GTK version
'wireshark' since the Qt version is far from feature-complete.

Cheers,
Balint


> Evan
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Bálint Réczey <balint () balintreczey hu> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to suggest renaming the relatively new qtshark binary to
> > wireshark-qt.
> > I believe wireshark-qt would align better with the practice of
> > providing the very same software
> > for different UI toolkits with the same name postfixed by the UI toolkit name.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe