Re: When did autotools started to use AM_CPPFLAGS

[David Arnold <davida () pobox com>]

On 11/03/2013, at 8:10 AM, Jaap Keuter wrote:

Hi Jaap,

> ref bug 8452.
>
> When did autotools started to use AM_CPPFLAGS, which are now favorable over
> INCLUDE? Do we break anything with this cleanup?

(I submitted the bug)

The automake documentation says:

  INCLUDES
  This does the same job as AM_CPPFLAGS (or any per-target
  _CPPFLAGS variable if it is used). It is an older name for
  the same functionality. This variable is deprecated; we
  suggest using AM_CPPFLAGS and per-target _CPPFLAGS instead.

On that basis, I believe they're synonyms, and the automake folks are pushing everyone towards the AM_* style variables.

I see the annoying logspew using OSX with MacPorts and automake-1.13.1 (and I *think* on Debian/testing as well, but 
that box is inaccessible right now, so I cannot confirm that).

I've updated the bug,




d
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe