Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark
From: Anders Broman <anders.broman () ericsson com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:20:53 +0000
-----Original Message----- From: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Ewgenij Sokolovski Sent: den 11 januari 2013 11:16 To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark
"wireshark" the wrapper script or "wireshark" the program that gets installed when you do "make install"?The program that gets installed when I do "make install". The problem is that my dissector is not a plugin but a built-in one. The source code is in asn1/ directory. Thus, it should be loaded not dependant on whether Wireshark is run from build directory or not. Or do I misunderstand anything?
When creating the source code by running (n)make (using asn2wrs) the source code should be copied to the ../dissectors/Directory(automatically) and the file packet-foo.[ch] should be part of Makefile.common in that dir and CMakeLists.txt in ../epan or added to Custom.common. Regards Anders ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 10)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Guy Harris (Jan 10)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 10)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Guy Harris (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Anders Broman (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Anders Broman (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Guy Harris (Jan 11)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 14)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Ewgenij Sokolovski (Jan 10)
- Re: Wireshark vs. lt-wireshark Guy Harris (Jan 10)