Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 47381: /trunk-1.8/epan/dissectors/ /trunk-1.8/epan/dissectors/: packet-tcp.c


From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:45:13 -0500

Two points of interest here:

- The original fix in trunk was a coverity fix and wasn't backported
at the time (I assume) because it wasn't known to fix an actual crash.
Should we have some sort of policy to avoid this, by e.g. backporting
fixes for all coverity issues when possible?

- The exact check being made happens in two different places in trunk
with *exactly* the same code. Is that intentional (in which case there
should be an explanatory comment) or can one of them be removed?

Cheers,
Evan

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 7:41 PM,  <eapache () wireshark org> wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=47381

User: eapache
Date: 2013/01/30 04:41 PM

Log:
 Manually rediscover r43185 to fix
 https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8274

Directory: /trunk-1.8/epan/dissectors/
  Changes    Path            Action
  +1 -1      packet-tcp.c    Modified

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-commits mailing list <wireshark-commits () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits
             mailto:wireshark-commits-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: