Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 47381: /trunk-1.8/epan/dissectors/ /trunk-1.8/epan/dissectors/: packet-tcp.c
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:45:13 -0500
Two points of interest here: - The original fix in trunk was a coverity fix and wasn't backported at the time (I assume) because it wasn't known to fix an actual crash. Should we have some sort of policy to avoid this, by e.g. backporting fixes for all coverity issues when possible? - The exact check being made happens in two different places in trunk with *exactly* the same code. Is that intentional (in which case there should be an explanatory comment) or can one of them be removed? Cheers, Evan On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 7:41 PM, <eapache () wireshark org> wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=47381 User: eapache Date: 2013/01/30 04:41 PM Log: Manually rediscover r43185 to fix https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8274 Directory: /trunk-1.8/epan/dissectors/ Changes Path Action +1 -1 packet-tcp.c Modified ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-commits mailing list <wireshark-commits () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits mailto:wireshark-commits-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 47381: /trunk-1.8/epan/dissectors/ /trunk-1.8/epan/dissectors/: packet-tcp.c Evan Huus (Jan 30)