Re: how correct add to tree reassebled data?

[Ilya Shvetsov <chvetsov () gmail com>]

Oh, that sounds greate. Thank you
Will this change also included into 1.9?

> I'm not yet sure if this
> should be backported to 1.8 yet, but in any case,


I think there is no need in backporting. It will be enough if this function
will be in future versions
--
With best regards
Ilya 'Akhil' Shvetsov



On 7 February 2013 22:14, Christopher Maynard <Christopher.Maynard () gtech com
> wrote:

> Ilya Shvetsov <chvetsov@...> writes:
>
> > But I have to mention, that if i use proto_tree_set_visible, my dissector
> fails to link. May be this happens because proto_tree_set_visible are not
> in
> export table.
>
> I added it to epan/libwireshark.def in trunk r47535.  I'm not yet sure if
> this
> should be backported to 1.8 yet, but in any case, if you're compiling
> Wireshark
> yourself, then that's all you should need to do, I would think.
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe