Re: SI vs. IEC prefixes

[Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>]

On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:34:33AM +0000, Christopher Maynard wrote:
> For example, if a user wants to set a maximum file size, then I think it's
> more intuitive to the user to specify and expect SI, powers of 10, units to
> apply rather than the IEC, powers of 2, units.  This might end up being a
> bit strange on some OS's (Windows, for example) to see a 977KB file size for
> file that's actually 1MB in size, but apparently at least one OS, Mac OS X
> version 10.6 will now use MB for all file and disk sizes so that same 1MB
> file will actually be correctly reported as such.  This to me makes the most
> sense, and so I'm in favor of changing the code to (and prefixes back to) SI
> units.
>
> This could also be said of the capture buffer size, which is currently
> incorrectly reported as MB (when it's really MiB).
>
> What do others think before I make any changes to SI units?

Please change to SI in these cases.

Thanks
   Jörg


-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer () loplof de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe