Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Thoughts on disabling an old dissector
From: Michael Lum <michael.lum () starsolutions com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:51:40 -0800
I asked around internally and as a customer of AudioCodes we still use that dissector. Michael Lum (michael.lum () starsolutions com) | STAR SOLUTIONS | Principal Software Engineer 4600 Jacombs Road, Richmond BC, Canada V6V 3B1 | +1.604.303.2315
-----Original Message----- From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Joerg Mayer Sent: December 18, 2013 10:48 AM To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Thoughts on disabling an old dissector On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 01:33:00PM -0500, Evan Huus wrote:This was originally filed as bug 9569. The situation issufficientlyunusual that I really don't know what the best solution is, so I figured I'd ask for general comments from the list. The company who created and used the TPNCP protocol (and submitted thepacket-tpncp.cdissector) wants to reuse that name for a new, differentprotocol andare asking us to disable the old dissector to avoidconflicts. The bughas more detail. https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9569I just added the following to the bug: """ My preferred solution would be to keep the old protocol as version 1, add the new protocol as version 2 into the same dissector and add a preference to select which version to use (with a default of 2). It doesn't have to be 1 or 2 of course. """ Ciao Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ______________________________________________________________ _____________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Thoughts on disabling an old dissector Evan Huus (Dec 18)
- Re: Thoughts on disabling an old dissector Joerg Mayer (Dec 18)
- Re: Thoughts on disabling an old dissector Michael Lum (Dec 18)
- Re: Thoughts on disabling an old dissector Tyson Key (Dec 18)
- Re: Thoughts on disabling an old dissector Christopher Maynard (Dec 18)
- Re: Thoughts on disabling an old dissector ronnie sahlberg (Dec 18)
- Re: Thoughts on disabling an old dissector Joerg Mayer (Dec 18)