Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Unused dissector tables
From: "Tyson Key" <tyson.key () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:14:55 +0000
Hi Gerald, Although the USB CCID, and packet-rfid-* dissectors invoke others to do payload dissection, I believe that the unused dissector table registration code was a left-over from initial design attempts - so it's probably safe to remove it. I hope that helps, Tyson. -----Original Message----- From: Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org> Sender: wireshark-dev-bounces@wireshark.orgDate: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:03:57 To: Developer support list for Wireshark<wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Reply-To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Unused dissector tables The following dissectors create dissector tables but don't appear to use them: packet-aim.c packet-fcp.c packet-rfid-mifare.c packet-rfid-pn532.c packet-rsvp.c packet-usb-ccid.c Should the registration code be disabled or removed? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Unused dissector tables Gerald Combs (Dec 12)
- Re: Unused dissector tables Tyson Key (Dec 12)
- Re: Unused dissector tables Martin Kaiser (Dec 12)
- Re: Unused dissector tables Guy Harris (Dec 12)
- Re: Unused dissector tables Guy Harris (Dec 12)
- Re: Unused dissector tables Guy Harris (Dec 12)
- Re: Unused dissector tables Tyson Key (Dec 12)