Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: addr_resolv.c, transport name resolution appalingly slow.


From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 10:00:33 -0400

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Anders Broman
<anders.broman () ericsson com> wrote:
Hi,

I will revert the change to use a hash table for transport name resolution
as soon as I can, the performance is horrible.

It shouldn't be, glib hash tables are pretty efficient. If you
profile, where is the time being spent?
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: