Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Wireshark 1.8.1 Duplicate protocol name
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 03:20:22 +0200
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 09:03:32PM +0000, Paul Ring wrote:
So, what I found was that I had to remove a number of plug-ins to get it to run. I basically did a grep in the plugin directory looking for GIOP. BTW, the directory is:
..
Not sure what functionality I'll lose moving this plugins, but at least it's running. Sure I'll find out what I'm missing later :)
Most likely you loose nothing, because IIRC these dissectors were changed from plugins to builtin dissectors. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r42974 | etxrab | 2012-06-01 17:57:05 +0200 (Fr, 01 Jun 2012) | 1 line Make packet-coseventcomm.c a bultin dissector ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ciao Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Wireshark 1.8.1 Duplicate protocol name Paul Ring (Sep 03)
- Re: Wireshark 1.8.1 Duplicate protocol name Joerg Mayer (Sep 03)