Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 45189: /trunk/ /trunk/: cfile.h file.c
From: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 22:17:39 +0100
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 01:12:50PM +0200, Jakub Zawadzki wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 06:32:26PM +0200, Jakub Zawadzki wrote:If we want to have bug #6208 fixed in 1.x we need to revert r45189 + do: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6208#c9 I'm not sure if I have time for writting such patch, but If anyone write one, I can review.Attaching patch for testing, still I have one XXX, to quote: + if (cf->count < frames_count && framenum <= cf->count) { + /* XXX, what we should do when new frames were received during rescaning but user clicked abort? + * - call packet_list_append() for all new frames? + * - just warn user? + */ + }
Ping? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 45189: /trunk/ /trunk/: cfile.h file.c Jakub Zawadzki (Nov 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 45189: /trunk/ /trunk/: cfile.h file.c Evan Huus (Nov 03)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 45189: /trunk/ /trunk/: cfile.h file.c Jakub Zawadzki (Nov 04)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 45189: /trunk/ /trunk/: cfile.h file.c Evan Huus (Nov 04)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 45189: /trunk/ /trunk/: cfile.h file.c Jakub Zawadzki (Nov 04)