Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 42676: /trunk/epan/ /trunk/epan/: proto.c
From: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 20:56:24 +0200
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:53:23PM -0400, Maynard, Chris wrote:
Was it the intention to call the function, protoo_strlcpy(), or is that a typo and it should be renamed to proto_strlcpy()?
I did it on purpose, to make commit looks nicer: (int)g_strlcpy protoo_strlcpy Still it's workaround. Ultimately I hope to remove this function. I just need to find some motivation and guard all g_strlcpy(), g_snprintf() with offset_[er] < size. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 42676: /trunk/epan/ /trunk/epan/: proto.c Maynard, Chris (May 28)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 42676: /trunk/epan/ /trunk/epan/: proto.c Jakub Zawadzki (May 28)