Re: More problems with Windows 7 firewall

[Sake Blok <sake () euronet nl>]

On 7 mrt 2012, at 12:02, David Aldrich wrote:

> I wrote in a thread last week that we have a Windows 7 console application that communicates with an embedded 
> processor card using UDP.  I have watched the communication flow using Wireshark and it looks fine.  I have set, what 
> I believe to be, appropriate inbound and outbound rules for Windows 7 firewall.  On one PC the application runs fine, 
> but on another PC inbound packets on one port are not reaching the application.
>  
> The weird thing is that on the failing PC, if I start a Wireshark capture on the interface, the inbound packets do 
> reach my application.  As soon as I stop the capture the inbound packets fail to reach the application.
>  
> Please can anyone suggest why Wireshark is having this effect?

Wireshak will put the capture interface in promiscuous mode by default. This means it will forward all packets on the 
captured interface to the OS. When a NIC is not in promiscuous mode, it will only forward frames to it's own 
mac-address, the broadcast address and every multicast address that the NIC has been subscribed to.

What kind of traffic does your application use? And if it uses multicasts, do you actively subscribe to the multicast 
group(s)?

Cheers,
Sake

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe