Re: Should payload dissectors' (RTP) packets depend on call-setup dissectors' (SIP) packets?

[Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>]

Hi,

Yes, that setup frame should be sufficient. The problem now is that not the correct setup frame is tagged, but that is 
another matter. 
Point is case is the SIP/SDP packet defining the conversation, to which the RTP dissector is set. 

Thanks,
Jaap

Send from my iPhone

On 1 jun. 2012, at 20:44, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com> wrote:

> One of the more frequently asked questions/reported bugs is users filtering for RTP, saving^W exporting those 
> displayed packets, then opening the new capture file only to find plain UDP.  This is because the call-setup protocol 
> (e.g., SIP) wasn't included in the display filter.
>
> Now we have the ability to mark frames as dependent on others.  Should, for example, RTP frames mark the call-setup 
> frames as dependencies?  (I noticed that RTP has a Setup Frame field; would one frame really be enough?)
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe