Wireshark mailing list archives

Style question passing boolean parameters


From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 07:12:26 +0200

The following commit retriggered an allergic reaction to controlling function
behaviour via booleans:

        if (cf_save_packets(&cfile, file_name8->str, filetype, FALSE/*compressed */, FALSE/*discard_comments */, 
FALSE/* dont_reopen */) != CF_OK) {

To me, this is sort of unreadable without the comments and ugly looking with
the comments. My favourite nightmare in this regard in wireshark source is
dissect_ieee80211_common which has 4 boolean parameters and no comments anywhere
where it is called.

What ways are there to fix this? Is replacing the boolean types by an enum with
speaking elements a valid solution? As an example, the above might read:

        if (cf_save_packets(&cfile, file_name8->str, filetype, NOT_COMPRESSED, DONT_DISCARD_COMMENTS, DONT_REOPEN) != 
CF_OK) {

What would be good names for the elements in the enums?

 Ciao
    Jörg
-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer () loplof de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: