Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Display filter alternative
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 13:53:49 -0700
On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:38 AM, Lloyd wrote:
I am studying about packet filtering methods. Then I came across NetBee library (combination of NetPDL+NetPFL+NetVM), by the developer of Winpcap. I have not tried the libary yet, but the authors claim that it is a very flexible, efficient and an extendable system (O. Morandi, F. Risso, M. Baldi, A. Baldini, “Enabling Flexible Packet Filtering Through Dynamic Code Generation”). I am interested in comparing Wireshark's display filter against the Netbee system for efficiency and extendability. The have compared their system against BPF but not with wireshark's display filter.
Wireshark's display filter is different from both BPF and NetBee. BPF and NetBee both involve code that extracts fields from packets and does tests on them; Wireshark's display filter works on an already-parsed packet, so the extracting of fields from packets has already been done by the time the display filter works on it. I.e., the Wireshark display filter is *NOT* a standalone mechanism; it relies on Wireshark dissectors existing and having been run on the packet. (BTW, they should perhaps have tried doing their development on a platform that implements ntohs() and ntohl() as inlines; I think glibc+GCC does that, and it appears that MSVC++ in Visual Studio 2005 and later would allow that as well: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/a3140177(v=vs.80).aspx although whether Winsock or whatever provides ntohs() and ntohl() does so is another matter. The ability to do byte-swapping of host-byte-order quantities inline is *not* an inherent advantage of other languages over C for generating packet-filtering code....) ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Display filter alternative Lloyd (Jul 05)
- Re: Display filter alternative Guy Harris (Jul 05)