SDH Bug and reassembly query.

[Andrew Kampjes <Andrew.Kampjes () endace com>]

I recently submitted the bug and patch:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7490

I was wondering someone could take a look at it. The technique that I've used for reassembly doesn't seem to be the 
most orthodox (based on the reassembly done in other protocols, unlike most protocols SDH works in more of a column 
oriented way) and would really appreciate some feedback on it.


Regards,
Andrew.

--
Andrew Kampjes
Junior Software Developer - Endace

andrew.kampjes () endace com <mailto:andrew.kampjes () endace com>
www.endace.com;<http://www.endace.com/> LinkedIn;<http://www.linkedin.com/companies/endace> follow us on 
Twitter<http://twitter.com/endace>

power to see all

This email (including any attachments) is intended to be read by the named recipient(s) only. If the email wasn't 
addressed to you, you mustn't use, distribute or copy any part of it. If you've received it in error please delete it 
(along with any attachments) and inform us of the error. Emails aren't secure and can't be guaranteed to be error free 
as they can be intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed. It's your responsibility to check this email and any 
attachments for viruses. These risks are deemed accepted by everyone that communicates with us by email.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe