Re: Question regarding QT/future Wireshark version

[Andreas Sikkema <h323 () ramdyne nl>]

On 1/6/12 3:15 PM, Roland Knall wrote:
> On another note. If in the long term Qt is the way to go, should all
> references to gtk usage be replaced by a more generic version of such
> functions, which in the meantime call the gtk version as a first step?
> That would allow for the future to prepare a wireshark without gtk and
> glib. GHashTable for instance get's used quite a lot.


Since getting back into Wireshark development I have this itch somewhere
int he back of my head to create a proper OS X version of Wireshark, but
have shied away from the amount of work involved ;-)

-- 
Andreas Sikkema
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe