Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 46513: /trunk/ /trunk/doc/: dumpcap.pod tshark.pod /trunk/: dumpcap.c tshark.c


From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:27:44 -0500

Yeah, possibly. Or wait until one of us gets around to rewriting (and unifying) all the command-line arguments, presumably with --long-options for some of the obscure options. ;-)

On 12/11/2012 09:22 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
Presumably "goto packet" should be moved to -G so that -g is
consistent across all the tools.

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Maynard, Chris
<Christopher.Maynard () gtech com> wrote:
"-G" for Wireshark?
- Chris
________________________________________
From: wireshark-commits-bounces () wireshark org [wireshark-commits-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of morriss () 
wireshark org [morriss () wireshark org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 9:07 PM
To: wireshark-commits () wireshark org
Subject: [Wireshark-commits] rev 46513: /trunk/ /trunk/doc/: dumpcap.pod tshark.pod /trunk/: dumpcap.c tshark.c

http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=46513

User: morriss
Date: 2012/12/11 06:07 PM

Log:
  Document the "-g" option to dumpcap.

  Add that option to tshark, too, and document it.

  The option can't be given to Wireshark because the GUI already has a "-g"
  (goto packet).

Directory: /trunk/doc/
   Changes    Path           Action
   +7 -0      dumpcap.pod    Modified
   +7 -0      tshark.pod     Modified

Directory: /trunk/
   Changes    Path          Action
   +1 -1      dumpcap.c     Modified
   +2 -0      tshark.c      Modified

--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the intended 
recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, 
please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender by replying to this email.  Thank you.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: