Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Buildbot version number in fuzz-test bugs?
From: Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 14:57:08 -0500
On 12/5/2012 2:32 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
In cases like bug 8045 [1], it would have been handy for it to say in the report somewhere which build-bot (version and OS) had found the error... is that reasonably easy to do? Thanks, Evan
I agree completely: As I've going through the process of digging thru the details trying to understand the "crash" reports, I've been making up a list of infomation which would be useful to include in the Bug report to make diagnosis easier.
I'll post the list in a bit (once I've completed the process of going thru these crash reports).
Bill ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Buildbot version number in fuzz-test bugs? Evan Huus (Dec 05)
- Re: Buildbot version number in fuzz-test bugs? Bill Meier (Dec 05)
- Re: Buildbot version number in fuzz-test bugs? Bill Meier (Dec 05)
- Re: Buildbot version number in fuzz-test bugs? Gerald Combs (Dec 07)
- Re: Buildbot version number in fuzz-test bugs? Bill Meier (Dec 07)
- Re: Buildbot version number in fuzz-test bugs? Bill Meier (Dec 05)
- Re: Buildbot version number in fuzz-test bugs? Bill Meier (Dec 05)
- Re: Buildbot version number in fuzz-test bugs? Jeff Morriss (Dec 05)
- Re: Buildbot version number in fuzz-test bugs? Jeff Morriss (Dec 05)