Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 46320: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-bthci_acl.c

[Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>]

This sounds like something wmem could solve - if there is an intermediate
scope between ep and se in duration then it should be possible to create
another wmem scope for use here.

Is the needed scope for these addresses well defined?


On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:46 PM, <morriss () wireshark org> wrote:

> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=46320
>
> User: morriss
> Date: 2012/12/01 06:46 PM
>
> Log:
>  Fix https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8030 :
>
>  Don't store an AT_STRINGZ address in ep_ allocated memory: that memory is
>  freed before the addresses may be used.  Use se_ memory instead (no,
> that's
>  not really ideal either).
>
>  It would appear that several other dissectors have the same problem.
>
> Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
>   Changes    Path                  Action
>   +2 -2      packet-bthci_acl.c    Modified
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-commits mailing list <
> wireshark-commits () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits
>              mailto:wireshark-commits-request () wireshark org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe