Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Troubleshooting slow network


From: Martin Visser <martinvisser99 () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 09:03:13 +1100

Just to be clear, 2 packets, 1ms apart IS 1000 pps - just not typically
valid for extrapolation that might make you t think the network is busy

Regards, Martin

MartinVisser99 () gmail com


On 3 December 2012 08:59, Martin Visser <martinvisser99 () gmail com> wrote:

Cheikhou,

A couple of things.

1. The packets per second column is an anomaly in this case. You only have
a few packets (most show 2). So the calculation of pps is really going to
be skewed here. (2 packets very close to each other, say 1ms apart, would
be interpreted as 1000 pps - clearly not right).
2. This isn't going to tell you anything about Internet usage. You are
only seeing the "leaked" traffic from multicasts to your port.
 You will need to get someway of getting the traffic on the Internet link.
There are a few switches available for only a few hundred dollars that can
do port-mirroring. Another way is to set up a PC (Linux is best) in bridge
mode, and run Wireshark on this as it sees the traffic go by.

Regards, Martin

Regards, Martin

MartinVisser99 () gmail com



On 3 December 2012 00:57, Cheikhou Dramé <dramecheikhou () gmail com> wrote:

 Le 02/12/2012 04:04, Martin Visser a écrit :

Multicast on UDP port 1900 will be SSDP or now known as UPnP, Universal
Plug and Play. This is just a control protocol used to discover services on
the network. The traffic you see might be PC or the like advertising they
have Audio/Video available, or your router advertising that a PC can use it
to open up it's firewall (for games/bittorent etc).

 As it is really just a control protocol, not for sending actual data
payloads, 15K packets/sec seems very high. Are you sure this is correct.
You can identify the source from the source address - which will be unique
on your network - or probably in the packets themselves. (You might need to
set UDP port 1900 to be decoded as SSDP).

 When you say the network is "slow" you need to be more specific. Is
this only to/from the Internet or also LAN to LAN?

Also don't forget that when you do a Wireshark capture on just a regular
switch port - you will ONLY see your own traffic and multicast/broadcast
traffic. Hence you might not be seeing the greater proportion of traffic in
your network. To this you need to enable port-mirroring on your switch and
use Wireshark in promiscuous mode.

Regards, Martin

MartinVisser99 () gmail com


On 1 December 2012 04:43, Cheikhou Dramé <dramecheikhou () gmail com> wrote:

port 1900



thanks for your reply. My switches can't do port-mirroring.As seen in the
file i have join , you can see the traffic wich i'm talking about , the
network is slow just from and to  the internet.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe <wireshark-users-request () 
wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe>




___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org
?subject=unsubscribe



___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: