Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented?

From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:33:33 -0800


On Dec 14, 2012, at 1:17 AM, Peter Valdemar Mørch <peter () morch com> wrote:

To this end, I tried your suggestion:

tshark -2 -r unfiltered.pcap -R snmp -w snmp.pcap


To which I got:
Segmentation fault (core dumped)


That's a bug.

Could you please file a report on that at http://bugs.wireshark.org so that this can be tracked, and attach your 
capture to it (so that it ends up in our "capture menagerie" for regression and fuzz testing)?
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread:

tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Peter Valdemar Mørch (Dec 13)
- Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Guy Harris (Dec 13)
  - Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Peter Valdemar Mørch (Dec 14)
    - Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Bill Meier (Dec 14)
    - Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Sake Blok (Dec 15)
    - Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Guy Harris (Dec 15)
    - Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Peter Valdemar Mørch (Dec 17)