Re: Right-button scrolling in TCP Graphs broken in 1.8.0?

[Anders Broman <a.broman () bredband net>]

Martin Mathieson skrev 2012-08-01 23:09:
> There is a comment in the code to say that the crosshairs with the 
> lines didn't work well with cairo.  The code is still there but things 
> are currently configured to use the crosshair cursor instead.
>
> I have reused the TCP graph code for another protocol recently, and 
> plan to try enabling the line-drawing code to see if I can see what 
> goes wrong.  An alternative might be a text control that gets updated 
> with time+sequence number when the cursor moves.  Does anyone know 
> what went wrong with the cross-hair lines, or on what platforms?
xor does not work with cairo so some completely different approach is 
needed.
> Martin
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Dana J. Dawson 
> <Dana.Dawson () centurylink com <mailto:Dana.Dawson () centurylink com>> wrote:
>
>     So I'm guessing not many people use this feature (assuming it
>     really is a feature).  I've also noticed that the crosshairs have
>     become a small "+" symbol instead of the vertical and horizontal
>     hairlines that extended all the way to both axes, which made it
>     easier to determine the values of the associated coordinates for
>     the crosshair location.  It would be nice if that old behavior
>     returned as well.
>
>     Should I  be submitting a bug report/feature request for this stuff?
>
>     Thanks!
>
>     Dana
>
>     On Jul 5, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Dana J. Dawson
>     <Dana.Dawson () CenturyLink com> wrote:
>
>     > I use the various TCP Graphs quite a bit and just noticed that
>     scrolling a zoomed TCP Graph, such as a Time Sequence graph, by
>     clicking and dragging with the right mouse button no longer seems
>     to work with the new 1.8.0 version.  I've tried this both on
>     Windows 7 and Mac OS X Lion and get the same behavior.  Falling
>     back to 1.6.8 restores the feature.  I haven't found this panning
>     feature documented in any of the Wireshark manuals, so maybe this
>     is not a supported feature, but if it is expected to work it no
>     longer seems to.
>     >
>     > Has anyone else encountered this yet?  I know I can use the
>     arrow keys, but the resolution is a bit coarse via that method and
>     it's much less convenient.
>     >
>     > Thanks in advance!
>     >
>     > Dana
>
>     ___________________________________________________________________________
>     Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list
>     <wireshark-users () wireshark org <mailto:wireshark-users () wireshark org>>
>     Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
>     Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
>                  mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org
>     <mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org>?subject=unsubscribe
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
>               mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe