Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: tcp_dissect_pdus() & fixed_len issue


From: Tobias Weiss <tweiss () ra rockwell com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:39:53 -0400

Some packets are quite big and won't be transferred within a single TCP 
packet. So as far as I understand (I'm really not a wireshark expert) I 
need TCP desegmentation.





Stephen Fisher <steve () stephen-fisher com> 
Sent by: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org
04/26/2012 12:47 PM
Please respond to
Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>


To
Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
cc

Subject
Re: [Wireshark-dev] tcp_dissect_pdus() & fixed_len issue







---- On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 06:55:02 -0600 Tobias 
Weiss<tweiss () ra rockwell com> wrote ---- 

I'm currently developing a dissector for a quite old TCP protocol. Most 
of the stuff is straight forward and not a real problem. But right now I'm 
facing an issue and need some help. 

In my main dissector function I'm calling tcp_dissect_pdus(), but there 
are 3 cases or let's say headers which could be within the stream: 

Before going any further, I want to confirm that you do need TCP 
desegmentation and that you can't deal with the packets one-by-one 
(probably with the help of conversation tracking).

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: