Re: [PATCH] dependent_frames memleak?

[Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>]

On 04/02/2012 03:07 PM, Jakub Zawadzki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looking at r41216 I think dependent_frames list should be always freed,
> not only in add_packet_to_packet_list().
>
> Can someone review attached patch? Jeff?

Oops, yes, you're right--it leaks memory! :-(  And I think your patch is 
good.

ps. welcome back!
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe