Re: Latency in RTP streams

[Patrice Bertin <patrice.bertin94 () gmail com>]

I got it. Thank you very much!

Regards,

Patrice


El jue, 06-10-2011 a las 15:38 +0200, RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR **
escribió:
> Hi,
>
> The "X" on the stream appears if at least one packet is marked non-OK.
> non-OK currently includes:
> * Comfort noise (PT=13 or PT=19)
> * Wrong sequence nr.
> * Changes in Payload type (PT)
> * Incorrect timestamp
> * Marker missing?
>
> for details, see gtk/rtp_analysis.c
> As you can see, there's no check concerning the latency or framing.
>
> For other info around RTP analysis, see http://wiki.wireshark.org/RTP_statistics
>
> Regards,
> Lars
>  
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Patrice 
> Bertin
> Sent: jeudi 6 octobre 2011 15:19
> To: wireshark-users () wireshark org
> Subject: [Wireshark-users] Latency in RTP streams
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have a capture example of a SIP call with G711 codec.
> Looking at the RTP streams, the final field shows an X which normally means that we have a VoIP related problem. 
> By selecting the problematic stream and analysing it, wireshark provides a packet-by-packet look at the stream. 
> The thing I don't understand, is why does it give me the status "OK"
> everywhere if I have the famous X and especially when I have a latency of 5843.74 ms (cf the screencapture joined in 
> the mail).
> Other thing, which values Wireshark put for the latency and jitter? Is it possible to modify it?
>
> I hope this is understandable enough.
>
> Thanks for your reply
>
>
> Patrice  
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
>              mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe