Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Is "tcp.len < -1" a valid display filter?

From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:52:04 -0700


On Oct 28, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Stig Bjørlykke wrote:

The checks will introduce more conversions from string to integer, but
that may not be an issue?


Unless somebody has a Wireshark extension or script running TShark or something of that sort that attempts to compile 
millions of filters per second, it's probably not a performance issue. :-)
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread:

Is "tcp.len < -1" a valid display filter? Stig Bjørlykke (Oct 26)
- Re: Is "tcp.len < -1" a valid display filter? Stephen Fisher (Oct 27)
  - Re: Is "tcp.len < -1" a valid display filter? Stig Bjørlykke (Oct 28)
    - Re: Is "tcp.len < -1" a valid display filter? Stephen Fisher (Oct 28)
    - Re: Is "tcp.len < -1" a valid display filter? Stig Bjørlykke (Oct 28)
    - Re: Is "tcp.len < -1" a valid display filter? Guy Harris (Oct 28)