Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 39384: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-pdcp-lte.c
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:42:49 -0700
(Paging LTE experts here....) On Oct 12, 2011, at 8:02 AM, wmeier () wireshark org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=39384 User: wmeier Date: 2011/10/12 08:02 AM Log: Fix a benign bug: Use correct proto_tree_add_item() encoding arg.
At least as I read RFC 3095: UOR-2-TS 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ | 1 1 0 | TS | +===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+ |T=1| M | SN | +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ | X | CRC | +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ neither the old code nor the new code are correct - the "M" bit is in the octet after the TS field. I don't see anything obvious in 3GPP TS 36.323 itself that says the format is different; does something in a later RFC specify something different? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 39384: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-pdcp-lte.c Guy Harris (Oct 12)