Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: SPX protocol subdissector
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:11:21 -0800
On Nov 24, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Andreas wrote:
You can only use add your dissector for fields that are registered with register_dissector_table for this purpose.
...and they're not fields, they're just dissector tables; by *convention*, dissector tables are often given the same name as fields, if they happen to correspond exactly to one particular field, but that's not a requirement - there's no field named "ethertype", but there's a dissector table named "ethertype", which is used for several fields (the type field in Ethernet packets, the protocol ID field in SNAP packets with an OUI of 00:00:00, etc.), and most fields don't have dissector tables associated with them.
I fear you can't register your dissector without changing packet-ipx.c.
...by adding a new dissector table and code to use it.
I am not experienced with heuristic dissectors. Probably you can register your dissector with "spx" using heur_dissector_add().
No - you'd have to add a heuristic dissector table to the SPX dissector, so you can't even register it heuristically without changing packet-ipx.c. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- SPX protocol subdissector Sergey Glebov (Nov 24)
- Re: SPX protocol subdissector Andreas (Nov 24)
- Re: SPX protocol subdissector Guy Harris (Nov 24)
- Re: SPX protocol subdissector Helge Kruse (Nov 25)
- Re: SPX protocol subdissector Guy Harris (Nov 25)
- Re: SPX protocol subdissector Sergey Glebov (Nov 25)
- Re: SPX protocol subdissector Stephen Fisher (Nov 25)
- Re: SPX protocol subdissector Guy Harris (Nov 24)
- Re: SPX protocol subdissector Andreas (Nov 24)