Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page
From: Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:57:39 -0800
It's easy enough to disable the "Development Release" section of the download widget until a development snapshot or release candidate is ready. We could also replace the download list with a link to http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/ but that would require a bit of navigation on the part of the user. On 11/7/11 8:39 AM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
It seems as if the model of 'just hold off the new development release until That New Feature(sm) (the next best thing after sliced bread) is in' doesn't really work. Like you said we opted to wait for the multi-interface capture to be in, and even though Irene is working hard on it, it hasn't materialized in solid form just yet. In practice the development release becomes stale as soon as the next branch comes out, and remain so until the next one is about to come along. So what to do? I say, remove the development pane with a new branch, and restore it once we have really something new to show, like a genuine RC. In the mean time, development builds (at the bleeding edge) remain available, so for the persistent ones there's always new stuff available. Gerald, I know this makes your release TODO list yet another item longer, something you don't like. I am sorry about that, maybe I've got some suggestions about that later. Thanks, Jaap On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 10:07:44 -0700, Gerald Combs wrote:Excellent question. We were holding off on making a development release over the summer until the multi-interface capture support settled down. Is there any reason to delay 1.7.0 at this point? On 11/2/11 12:51 AM, Dirk Jagdmann wrote:So today somebody at my company wanted to check the latest Wireshark. Looking at http://www.wireshark.org/download.html [1] he read the description literally which said that the 1.6.0rc2 is the latest development release. So he figured it might be newer than the fresh 1.6.3 release... I think we can remove that old release candidate, or alternatively put a daily/weekly tarball of trunk on that page. ---> Dirk Jagdmann ^ doj / cubic ----> http://cubic.org/~doj [2] -----> http://llg.cubic.org [3]___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- misleading description on Wireshark Download page Dirk Jagdmann (Nov 02)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Gerald Combs (Nov 02)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Alexis La Goutte (Nov 02)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Balint Reczey (Nov 02)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Chris Maynard (Nov 04)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Balint Reczey (Nov 05)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Chris Maynard (Nov 05)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Balint Reczey (Nov 07)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Alexis La Goutte (Nov 02)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Gerald Combs (Nov 02)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Gerald Combs (Nov 07)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Chris Maynard (Nov 08)