Re: IPv6 longest representation vs INET6_ADDRSTRLEN

[Sake Blok <sake () euronet nl>]

On 5 mei 2011, at 19:41, Gerald Combs wrote:
> On 5/5/11 6:01 AM, Jakub Zawadzki wrote:
> > On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 02:01:06PM +0200, Jakub Zawadzki wrote:
> > > IMHO when IPv4-mapping is used the longest address is:
> > > ::ffff:255.255.255.255 (22B)
> > >
> > > Anyone knows inet_ntop(AF_INET6, ..) implementation which can actually use 46 bytes?
> >
> > Maybe some inet_ntop() implementation don't generate short addresses? (0000 instead of ::)
> > so ipv4 mapped address would be: "0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:255.255.255.255"
> >
> > I think I'll just copy inet_ntop6() from wsutil/inet_ntop.c to address_to_str.c...
>
> RFC 2553 section 6.6 and MSDN's InetNtop documentation both specify 46
> characters, but you'd think that if an implementation was smart enough
> to check for v4-mapped addresses it would be smart enough to compress
> zeroes.

There is also the "IPv6 mixed notation" (or "Trailing dotted decimal notation" as Microsoft calls it) which displays 
the last 32 bits of a (general) IPv6 address in dotted decimal. This could indeed lead to 45 byte strings:

IE   2001:db8:1234:5678:9abc:def0:192.168.123.234

(OK, this is 44 bytes, but I wanted to stick to the 2001:db8::/32 example prefix)

Cheers,


Sake
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe