Wireshark mailing list archives
Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object
From: Max <dmitrmax () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 15:51:12 +0400
Hi to everyone! I'm writing a dissector for a TCP-based protocol. I have a conversation state object of my proto which is managed by conversation_*_proto_data(). The state object is alloced by se_alloc(), so it has a lifetime of capture, but the object itself contains libgcrypt handles which are alloced by g_malloc. How should I free these handles? Is there any mean to catch the moment when my state object is about to be destroyed? -- Max ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Max (May 01)
- Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Guy Harris (May 01)
- Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Max (May 01)
- Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Guy Harris (May 01)
- [PATCH] Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Max (May 01)
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object darkjames-ws (May 02)
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Max (May 02)
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Jakub Zawadzki (May 03)
- Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Max (May 01)
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Jeff Morriss (May 02)
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Guy Harris (May 02)
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Max (May 02)
- Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Guy Harris (May 01)