Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: tvb_composite
From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:07:14 -0400
Jakub Zawadzki wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 03:49:52PM -0400, Jeff Morriss wrote:I've never heard of anyone successfully using composite TVBs so I'm guessing the comment (from 2007) is still accurate.Not working and unused API for at least 4 years... it means than can be removed, right? :) Isn't reassemble.c API good (and working!) replacement for composite TVBs?
It works, but it uses memory.I still have high hopes (maybe just dreams?) of doing something to lower Wireshark's memory usage, and composite TVBs might play a part.
Of course, the fact that they don't work does imply we might want to comment them out for the time being--unless someone wants to get them working.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- tvb_composite Yosi Saggi (Mar 28)
- Re: tvb_composite Stephen Fisher (Mar 28)
- Re: tvb_composite Jeff Morriss (Mar 28)
- Re: tvb_composite Jakub Zawadzki (Mar 28)
- Re: tvb_composite Yosi Saggi (Mar 29)
- Re: tvb_composite Yosi Saggi (Mar 30)
- Re: tvb_composite Jeff Morriss (Mar 29)
- Re: tvb_composite Yosi Saggi (Mar 29)
- Re: tvb_composite Jeff Morriss (Mar 29)
- Re: tvb_composite Jakub Zawadzki (Mar 28)
- Re: tvb_composite Jakub Zawadzki (Mar 29)
- Re: tvb_composite Jakub Zawadzki (Mar 29)