Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: tvb_composite


From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:07:14 -0400

Jakub Zawadzki wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 03:49:52PM -0400, Jeff Morriss wrote:
I've never heard of anyone successfully using composite TVBs so I'm guessing the comment (from 2007) is still accurate.

Not working and unused API for at least 4 years... it means than can be removed, right? :)

Isn't reassemble.c API good (and working!) replacement for composite TVBs?

It works, but it uses memory.

I still have high hopes (maybe just dreams?) of doing something to lower Wireshark's memory usage, and composite TVBs might play a part.

Of course, the fact that they don't work does imply we might want to comment them out for the time being--unless someone wants to get them working.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: