Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Wireshark SVN does not build on Ubuntu 64bit (gtk/expert_dlg.c)


From: Anders Broman <anders.broman () ericsson com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:37:34 +0100

Hi,
Work in progress, yes but if you have the time to get it to work that would be great as I'm quite busy at the moment.
Regards
Anders 

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Roland Knall
Sent: den 22 mars 2011 16:31
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark SVN does not build on Ubuntu 64bit (gtk/expert_dlg.c)

That's why I did not file a bug-report. Thought that something like this was the reason. Am I right in thinking, that 
this is just a work in progress?

Don't mind the build not working for a while.

regards, Roland


On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Anders Broman <anders.broman () ericsson com> wrote:
Hi,
The idea was to get rid of expert_dlg.c and expert_dlg.h so everything 
needed should go to expert_comp_dlg.c/expert_comp_dlg.h and anything 
including expert_dlg.h should be changed to include expert_comp_dlg.h Instead.
I'm sorry for breaking the build...
Best regards
Anders

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org 
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Roland Knall
Sent: den 22 mars 2011 15:51
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark SVN does not build on Ubuntu 64bit 
(gtk/expert_dlg.c)

Hello

On my system, Wireshark does not build anymore since revision 36235.
The reason for this is the move of the struct expert_tapdata_s from gtk/expert_dlg.h to gtk/expert_comp_dlg.c .

The stump, which was left on gtk/expert_dlg.h does not work, as gtk/expert_dlg.c needs to use some members of the 
struct, and cannot do so, as to insufficient declaration for this struct.

Moving the complete struct back to expert_dlg.h and adding a #include to that header in expert_comp_dlg.c solves this 
issue.

I attached a corrsponding patch, but, am I missing something here?
Should it work?

btw, my system is a fresh setup, everything directly out of the box Ubuntu 10.10 64bit.

kind regards,
Roland
------------------
Tshark -v output:
Compiled (64-bit) with GLib 2.26.1, with libpcap 1.1.1, with libz 1.2.3.4, with POSIX capabilities (Linux), without 
libpcre, with SMI 0.4.8, with c-ares 1.7.3, with Lua 5.1, with Python, with GnuTLS 2.8.6, with Gcrypt 1.4.5, with MIT 
Kerberos, with GeoIP.

Running on Linux 2.6.35-28-generic, with libpcap version 1.1.1, with libz 1.2.3.4.

Built using gcc 4.4.5.
______________________________________________________________________
_____ Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list 
<wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: