Re: TCP windows update

[Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>]

On 03/01/2011 09:45 PM, Andrej van der Zee wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Thanks for you clear reply.
[SNIP]
> Maybe a silly question, but can a Windows update be piggy backed with a data
> segment, or is it always contained in a zero-length data segment?
>
> Also, can a Windows update contain an ACK number for non-ACKed data
> segments?

I guess Windows(tm) update would love to piggy back onto a data segment, and a 
Windows(tm) update's ACK number would be the release....

... but I assume that is not what you mean ;) Please be aware of the right 
terminology, Padawan.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
            mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe